By: John S. Anooshian and Paul A. Briganti On April 3, 2020, the Maryland Court of Appeals, in a closely-watched case, unanimously rejected the application of an “all sums” allocation
Category: Allocation
Connecticut Supreme Court Decides Significant Coverage Issues in R.T. Vanderbilt
On October 4, 2019 (almost two years after granting certification), the Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Court’s rulings on four key coverage issues in R.T. Vanderbilt Company v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, et al.
New York State Trial Court: Non-Cumulation Provision in Excess Policies Mandates “All Sums” Allocation
The court’s August 18, 2018 decision dealt with four Midland excess policies issued to American Smelting and Refining Company (ASARCO).
California Federal Court: “All Sums” Allocation Applies to Meso Case Under CA and NY Law
On March 15, 2018, a California federal court (for the Northern District) ruled that under either California or New York law an “all sums” allocation applies to claims for coverage for an underlying mesothelioma wrongful death action.
Complex Insurance Coverage Reporter – October 2017
Olin Corporation v. OneBeacon America Insurance Company and Top Developments